Editing
Kink .com
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Controversies == Despite its ethics-driven model, Kink.com has faced scrutiny: * Accusations from outside the industry labeling its content as "violent" or "abusive"—typically by critics unaware of BDSM consent culture. * Performer disputes over boundaries—most of which led to public revisions in studio policy. * Neighborhood opposition in San Francisco during the Armory era. * Public outcry from conservative groups and anti-porn activists. A 2013 campaign by some former performers raised concerns over high-pressure practices, but also triggered a more rigorous enforcement of performer check-ins and consent verification.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Lustipedia.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Lustipedia.com:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Lustipedia
Main Page
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information